online partners:

 

Globalization and Labor -- Part 3

This is our third and final installment in a 3 part series that is exploring the effects of the Universal Living Wage on business. We will explore savings and how the Universal Living Wage would look on a world scale.

Tax Savings

With 3.5 million people experiencing homelessness in the United Sates this year alone14 and with 42% of them working at some point15 (clearly the work ethic is there), it is conservatively estimated that no fewer than 1,000,000 people (one-third) will be able to work themselves off the streets of America with the passage of the Universal Living Wage.16

While we tend to think of minimum wage workers as individuals, we find that they often are attempting to sustain more than just themselves on the minimum wage. According to the collaborative work of Dr. Stephanie Luce (Living Wages/ Building a Fair Economy) and Economics Professor Robert Pollin (his fifth such writing) there exists a U.S. minimum wage family. This family comprises four people, two children, and two adults, one of whom is working at the minimum wage.17 This means a significant amount of government subsidies is currently required to minimally sustain this family. With the enactment of the ULW, it is conservatively estimated that a tax savings of $10.7 billion per year can be realized.

($10.7 billion per year in food stamp and welfare savings based on: a four-person family- one minimum wage worker, one spouse, and two children.)

According to the 2000 census there are:
10.1 million minimum wage workers18
65% of these include one or more members who work and yet must be subsidized ($1,627 savings per family)with food stamps, EITC, and MediCal19
10.1 mil x .65= Z
$1,627 x Z (6.565) = $10,681,255,000

Tax Savings with Passage of the ULW

According to Robert Pullin and Dr. Stephanie Luce in the analytical book The Living Wage:

*the family reliance on non health related subsidies will fall by 16.1%
*the family will become dramatically more credit worthy . . . thus being able to avail themselves of more goods and services which in turn will serve to stimulate the local economy.20

Furthermore, according to Beth Schulman, author of: The Betrayal of Work: How Low-Wage Jobs Fail 30 Million Americans and Their Families, these minimum wage jobs are no longer the employment/economic stepping stones of the past but rather the economic job plateaus at which people/families are stagnating now for years.21

*Note: It is universally agreed that earning a dollar of income is far superior to being given a dollar of government support in terms of one’s self-image or attitude toward life and work.

We are not suggesting the termination of programs such as food stamps, but rather that they revert to the transitional, emergency stop gap assistance programs they were initially intended to be by U.S. Congress in serving layed-off workers, battered women, natural disaster victims, etc. By conservative estimates, it is likely that the Universal Living Wage campaign will end homelessness for more than one million minimum wage workers, and it will prevent economic homelessness for all 10.1 million minimum wage workers. The result of which will generate millions of dollars in savings to tax payers.

General Effects- Regional Living Wage Campaigns

We find that there are serious concerns in the business community about local living wage campaigns. It has been suggested these local campaigns that draw circles around geographic areas are potentially damaging to small businesses. In fact, this was the basis of resistance to a living wage initiative in San Antonio, TX where it was feared that large business could and would pull up stakes and relocate just outside of the newly proposed wage boundary or that businesses would be drawn away from the region. The President of the San Antonio Restaurant Association was quoted as saying,

"We need to work with businesses to get businesses in San Antonio. Let’s say for
instance that Houston does not have a living wage and San Antonio does, and
the PGA (Professional Golf Association) says, ‘I can go to Houston and get these incentives to come, and I’m not forced to pay this living wage.’ So what’s going to happen? Where are they going to go? They’re going to go to Houston. (On the other hand) the federal minimum wage establishes a balance. It’s all industries. It’s nationwide. So there’s a balance . . . "22
-As reported in the San Antonio Express News 9/29/02
by Michelle Koivin

What effect will ULW have on business locating to a region?

For the most part, minimum wage jobs are support jobs. These low paying jobs are found in businesses such as the restaurant industry, janitorial, construction labor, landscaping, laundry, and the like. These are support type businesses. They support "principle" businesses that pay well above the minimum wage. Even when we immediately enact the Universal Living Wage, it will not affect the wages paid by these principal businesses to their lowest paid employees because they already pay more than the wages proposed under the Universal Living Wage. These minimum wage businesses will employ and lay off people based on their need to meet the support/service requirements of the principal businesses. If Intel Corp. moves to town, it does not make the decision to do so based on minimum, wage salary scales in as much as it does not generally employ workers at that low wage level. On the other hand, when Intel builds its offices it may contract employees such as construction laborers and ultimately landscapers who are minimum wage "support" workers, and once the facility is built, its workers will also need laundry services and restaurants, etc.

*Note: These support businesses do not ordinarily relocate independently of the principal businesses that they support. Clearly, in times of recession employees will be laid off but remember, support businesses will maintain the number of employees necessary to satisfy the needs of the principal business.

No doubt, there are a few businesses that are minimum wage industries. In Los Angeles there are the coat hanger industry and the garment industry. However, there is evidence of strong support of living wage jobs among employers even here. For example, Sweat X, with 43 employees, a multimillion dollar business in the heart of the garment industry has endorsed the Universal Living Wage.23 They recognize the benefits of paying living wages in that a stabilized work force is part of the cost of doing business and in the long run will reduce overall costs. In addition to Sweat-X, which is making sweat shirt apparel for America college students, is American Apparel which is also in the garment industry with more than 1,000 employees. It too is a multimillion dollar corporation and recognizes the benefits of paying living wages and has endorsed this initiative.24 The employees and the wages they are paid are of equal importance to that of any other budgetary consideration. Furthermore, these budgetary considerations must be valued in an appropriate fashion whether the business is for-profit or nonprofit such as a community development corporation (CDC).

By recognizing the critical importance to the overall stability of a business, (especially a new one), steps can be taken that will greatly reduce the high percentage of failed small business start-ups. Each year, 50% of all new business start-ups fail in the United Sates. Within five years, no less than 80% of all new business start-ups fail.25 Clearly, they need to start with the most solid financial footing possible.

When small businesses approach the U.S. Small Business Administration for loans, they must be encouraged to raise the level of budgeting for employee wages to the same level of importance as that of the manufacturing budget. It should be raised to the same level of as that of the advertising budget and to that of transportation, geographic location and that of product design, development and engineering.

In so doing, we can dramatically increase the percentage of success of these start-up businesses; increase the overall profitability of existing businesses and stimulate the economy generally.

Economic Stimulus Package

According to statistical surveys, minimum wage workers spend almost 100% of past wage increases right back into the economy thus creating quick economic growth and job creation.26

As seen with the passage of the U.S. Fair Labor Standard Act in 193827 in response to the Depression, establishing a "living" wage similarly stimulates the overall demand for goods and services in the economy. Again, the family will become dramatically more credit worthy thus being able to avail themselves of more goods and more services.28 And the overall demand for goods and services will, in and of itself, increase demand for low wage workers as industry responds to this demand and stimulation.29

Additionally, it is important to recognize that the difference between the existing U.S. Federal Minimum Wage and the Universal Living Wage is a considerable sum of money when calculated across the US. This difference represents an incredible national resource in as much as minimum wage consumers all need the same thing . . . affordable housing. Presently, housing, at this economic level, does not exist.30 Therefore, the enactment of the Universal Living Wage Initiative creates an incredible opportunity for the local construction industry across America. By responding to this need, the local construction industry will be able to benefit economically while providing an immeasurable service to the entire country. HSR Construction, a national housing construction company, based out of Austin, TX has recognized this early on and eagerly endorsed the Universal Living Wage Campaign.31 Clearly, this presents a true Economic Stimulus Package of enormous proportions.

Inflation Effects

Concern has been raised about what possible inflationary effects passage of the Universal Living Wage will have on consumer purchasing.

First it is clear that when looking at manufacturing, there are a large number of economic factors that comprise the budgetary costs of producing a product. Among these are manufacturing, transportation, design, marketing, geographic location, warehousing, profit taking, employee training and finally employee wages. We feel that employee wages should rank of equal importance to that of these other important components. There is room within any budget to absorb the payment of reasonable minimum wages. Beyond this, there may indeed be an inflationary component to the stabilization of our nation’s businesses. Just as business will need to cut back on their profit taking, likewise consumers will be asked to pay just a little more for goods and services. However, reportedly consumers have expressed a willingness to pay their "fair share" to help house our nation’s minimum wage workers meeting a similar pledge of many of our nation’s businesses. There are now more than 1,100 businesses, unions, religious groups, and nonprofits endorsing this initiative representing more than forty-five million registered voters.32

Overseas Job Loss

Of grave concern to both American business and American workers is the ever increasing loss of jobs overseas. However, as stated previously, minimum wage jobs in most cases are support jobs. Restaurant jobs, dry cleaning, landscaping, maids, retail sales people, warehousemen, construction workers, and many others are all support positions. If principal businesses expand, the need for these support minimum wage workers increases. As the principal businesses contract, so does the need for these support positions. However, these jobs are not about to be exported. These are local jobs and will remain local.33

The critical thing to recognize is that they are local worldwide. This will be the true challenge to unions and workers in the new millennium. At this time, there is a proposed settlement in the four and a half month strike of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union immediately affecting 70,000 workers. The union is faced with agreeing to a divisive two-tiered wage system for future employees who do not yet exist or losing health benefits for its current workers. These are the jobs that cannot be outsourced to India or China. These jobs will be saturated with applicants from overqualified workers whose original jobs have been outsourced. It will become the "last stand" of unions and workers to protect and secure living wages and health benefits for these jobs in every nation throughout the world.

Living wages are good for both business and tax payers. With the passage of the Universal Living Wage the base of America’s work force will become stabilized and motivated. More than one million minimum wage workers will be able to work themselves off the streets of America. All 10.1 million minimum wage earners will be able to avoid economic homelessness. The local construction industry will receive a true economic stimulus package nationwide. And finally, tax payers will realize a financial windfall both from averted subsidies and from avoiding extensive retraining costs.

Globalization and Labor

We have explored here one pragmatic approach to taking the existing U.S. Federal Minimum Wage standard and adapting it to the most basic needs of the United States minimum wage worker. We have done this to show the intricate steps needed to set a new economic bench mark that compliments a high moral standard. We have chosen the United States because it already embraces the moral premise that anyone working a certain number of hours should be able to afford the basic necessities of life. We are suggesting that once the United States has established this ethical standard in a workable fashion, the moral standard and general tenets can and will be exported/ replicated and embraced throughout the industrial world by every nation. Once this occurs, every nation and their people will gladly invite these transnational companies to bring their employment opportunities. Clearly it will still be to the economic advantage of employers to seek workers in places where wages are lower, but with this approach, people will be left financially intact when the companies leave. While they are there, the workers will enjoy basic living standards. Worldwide poverty will be positively affected and immigration issues will be favorably impacted.

This concludes our three part series entitled Universal Living Wage as it relates to globalization. To view the text in its entirety, find credits, end notes, to learn more about the Universal Living Wage, and to endorse on-line go to www.UnvirsalLivingWage.org.

ENDNOTES:

1 Eric Schlosser, It Fast Food Nation (Boston: Houghton Mifflin 2001)
2 2000 U.S. Census
3 Living Wages/Building a Fair Economy, Dr. Stephanie Luce & Professor Robert Pollen
4 Ibid
5 Reich, et al., Living Wages and Airport Security, Preliminary Report.
6 The Betrayal of Work: How Low Wage Jobs Fail 30 Million Americans and Their Families,
Beth Shulman
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Eric Schlosser, Fast Food Nation (Boston: Houghton Mifflin 2001)
10 Ibid
11 Ibid
12 www.NationalHomeless.org
13 www.UniversalLivingWage.org citing HUD Fair Market Rend Formula and Guidelines
14 www.NationalHomeless.org
15 U.S. Conference of Mayors Report, 2000
16 www.NationalHomeless.org
17 Living Wages/Building a Fair Economy, Dr. Stephanie Luce & Professor Robert Pollen
18 200 U.S. Census
19 Living Wages/Building a Fair Economy, Dr. Stephanie Luce & Professor Robert Pollen
20 Ibid
21 The Betrayal of Work: How Low Wage Jobs Fail 30 Million Americans and Their Families,
Beth Shulman
22 San Antonio Express News 9/29/02 by Michelle Koivin
23 www.UniversalLivingWage.org
24 Ibid
25 Small Business Administration, SBA
27 U.S. Congress, Fair Labor Standards Act, 1938
28 Living Wages/Building a Fair Economy, Dr. Stephanie Luce & Professor Robert Pollen
29 Ibid
30 The Betrayal of Work: How Low Wage Jobs Fail 30 Million Americans and Their Families,
Beth Shulman
31 www.UniversalLivingWage.org
32 Ibid
33 The Betrayal of Work: How Low Wage Jobs Fail 30 Million Americans and Their Families,
Beth Shulman